Skip to main content

TRUMP AND TRIUMPH by Saagar Kote

Predicting things in the political arena is a Herculean task indeed. Politics changes fast and takes us to different unforeseen directions. I was in the 5th semester of my undergraduate course pursuing EPS (Economics, Political Science and Sociology) at Christ University and had the privilege of being taught International Relations by Professor Venugopal Menon. It was the first half of 2015 and during class the question of Donald Trump was somehow brought into discussion. I strongly felt that Trump would definitely play a major role and probably even run for President. Professor Venugopal Menon totally dismissed my point and opined that Trump would never rise to such a level. Naturally, there was a lot of questioning and rebuttal from my side and Mr. Venugopal replied with great confidence and explained how democracy and secularism works in America.
He believed that Trump would never rise to a prominent position in the US because US democracy is rooted in liberalism and secularism. Given that Trump was seen as a polarizing figure by a considerable number of people, Mr. Venugopal's arguments did look strong. He had strong reasons to believe that the Right Wing would never become strong in the US. I of course had my own reasons to believe why Trump would grow in power. 9/11 and its consequences changed the American mind-set in an unprecedented manner. Islamophobia became the bitter truth of the day and Americans had very strong reasons to be wary of Muslims. Muslims faced racism and racial profiling in the post 9/11 US. Many whites who have historically controlled and dominated America definitely have found it difficult to accept Barack Obama and his 8 year rule as President. What many analysts and political scientists failed to recognize is that the feeling of insecurity prevailed in the minds of many Americans. The Americans always identified themselves as dogged defenders of freedom and liberty and never stoked any kind of nativism in spite of having the most patriotic national anthem-"Star Spangled Banner "
Today it flabbergasts every liberal as unthinkable. The Ku Klux Klan specter is staring down on the Americans because in the US nativism was confined to the Fringes of American radio and was never a part of mass political strategy.
The reason for this turnaround is the powerful American racialism and it never reconciled to the fact that a black controlled the country’s institution from 2008. It is a fact that American institutions have never been fair to the blacks and still has high discriminatory election laws. Yet, Obama a black that too born to a Muslim origin father symbolized usurping control of institutions earlier held by Whites and dented social prestige of a country which till 2008 had not selected a black or for that matter a woman president. Donald Trump’s statements and his growing popularity reflect the “bring back reactionary politics for the benefit of White Americans.”
Mexico and illegal immigration has always been a problem which the US had been unsuccessful in efficiently tackling. The Mexican migrants were viewed as job stealers by many Americans. The US economy had still not completely recovered from the evils of recession and the productivity of the US has not been the best in recent years. when Trump came into the picture, the discussion was centred around his personality and personal strengths and weaknesses alone The issues Trump spoke about were ignored. There was no discussion in the media on whether or not the issues raised by Trump made sense. Another aspect is the foreign policy. Obama's foreign policy had been confusing and without a clear aim. The question of intervention or non intervention in Syria became a big issue. China too seemed to rise and Russia too was gaining its strength under Vladimir Putin. One can say that Donald Trump was there at the right place at the right time. He spoke about strict border controls and even an uncompromising stand on Islamic terrorism and a ban on Muslims. He was also seen as a very successful man in the world of business and many Americans believed he could improve the economy.Trump managed to secure a tremendous amount of support and captured the Zeitgeist. It is always necessary to look beyond the personality of a politician. The issues made the difference in the case of Trump. Trump didn't try to be politically right and didn't hesitate to make extremely radical statements. Yes, Hillary Clinton seems to be a more balanced, experienced and an inclusive person but Trump's tough stance on many issues made him the Presidential candidate of the Republican Party. The media and even the political enthusiasts failed to recognize the public view. The need to project American power had also risen. America was losing out in many areas. There was no clarity from the side of the Obama administration and this was probably why Trump was seen as a agent of radical change. The Southern States of America too may naturally drift towards Trump. Iraq, Syria, South China Sea, The inability to strongly counter Russia, slow growth, the need for more jobs, border problems, illegal immigrants, Islamic terrorism and a general feeling of insecurity contributed to the rise of Trump and right wing politics in the US. It is still a very difficult election to call. Both results still seem to be possible. The election day is fast approaching and curiosity is the dominant feeling. Trump may or may not win the election but he has definitely managed to change the agenda and has shifted public debate to an unforeseen realm in the US. Thus Trump’s triumph proves the point that lecturing on Democracy, liberty and equality is far easier than practicing especially when social prestige is under threat. Trump and his rise is only the first of many things to come in the United States.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

National Level Essay Writing Competition

                                                                                                                    THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES POLITICAL SCIENCE AND HISTORY IN COLLABORATION WITH INDIAN COUNCIL OF WORLD AFFAIRS PRESENTS NATIONAL LEVEL ESSAY WRITING COMPETITION ON THE OCCASION OF 73rd INDEPENDENCE DAY  Last date of Submission: 25 th August 2020 We cordially invite all the undergraduate and postgraduate students Of all colleges and universities across India. Cash prizes: 1 st prize: 10,000/-                       2 nd prize: 7,500/-                  3 rd prize: 5,000/- CONTACT DETAILS: Sanjana Krishnan Sanjana.krishnan@law.christuniversity.in 7349753894 Aswathy Anil aswathy.anil@law.christuniversity.in 8891314588 Introduction The Indian Council of World Affairs (ICWA) in collaboration with the Department of International Studies, Political Science and History, CHRIST (Deemed to be University) announces to hold National-level Essay Writing Competition to m

The Multifaceted Nature of Populism

The Department of International Studies, Political Science and History organised a webinar on Populism titled ‘The Multifaceted Nature of Populism’ by Ajay Gudavarthy. Ajay Gudavarthy is an Associate Professor at the Centre for Political Studies of Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. He has been a visiting fellow at Goldsmiths, University of London, and a Charles Wallace Fellow at the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London. His most recent book is India After Modi: Populism and the Right (2018). Dr Madhumati Deshpande—Coordinator, Department of International Studies, Political Science and History, Christ (Deemed to be University)—delivered the introductory remarks and formally welcomed the guest speaker. Dr Gudavarthy begins his talk by pointing out that populism is not a new phenomenon and in the present times, the need for a multifaceted approach has arisen where it is necessary to draw approaches from other disciplines such as psychology, sociology, economi

MoU with ASHOKA University – Harvard Yenching Institute

                                  With immense pleasure and happiness, we would like to inform you that the Department of International Studies, Political Science and History, CHRIST (Deemed To Be University) has signed a MoU with Ashoka University – Harvard Yenching Institute. This MoU is to build academic and research resources on China Studies and related areas as a thriving discipline. It will also enable the department to create new knowledge in India about different countries, particularly on China. The MoU will help the department to provide promising scholars studying China with the opportunity to share their work and knowledge with a wider audience through Lectures, Courses, and Publications and enhance research opportunities for young post-doctoral scholars. As per the provisions of the MoU, CHRIST will enrol and host postdoctoral fellow(s) selected through China Studies Postdoctoral Fellowship Programme in collaboration with Ashoka. The Parties of MoU shall collab